The following text has been automatically reproduced by an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) algorithm. It may not have been checked over by human eyes. For matters of precision please consult the original pdf.

36 Contents Page

CONTENTS
EDITORIAL: 1984 and all that ……………………………………………… Peter Osborne
ARTICLES
Sean Sayers
Marxism and the Dialectical Method: a Critique of G.A. Cohen, ………………..

Debate on Sexist Language:

Sexism and Semantics,
Deborah Cameron
More on Man Made Language,
Anne Beezer
Milton Fisk, Marxism and Ethics,
Andrew Collier
Towards a. Theory of Videotics,
Richard Osborne
0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

000.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

00000000.00000.0000.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0000.00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

Martin Ryle
Howard Feather
Allan Cochrane
Keith Pearson
Greg McLennan
Jean Grimshaw
Martin Barker
Peter Morriss
Gregory Glaeys
Sean Sayers

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.0.0000000000

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

•••

0

0

•••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

•••

••••

••••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

00.0.0000.

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

•••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

•••

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

••

0

0

0

•••

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

00

NEWS

0

0

0

0

0.0000.000

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

REVIEWS
Bahro: Socialism and Survival
Gorz: Farewell to the Working Class,
Geyer and Schweitzer: Alienation,
Teymur: Environmental Discourse,
Wolin: WaIter Benjamin,
Roberts: Walter Benjamin,
Rorty: Consequences of Pragmatism,
Frye: The Politics of Reality,
Geras: Marx and Human Nature,
Taylor: Community, Anarchy and Liberty,
Goodwin and Taylor: The Politics of Utopia,
Hudson: The Marxist Philosophy of Ernest Bloch, …

0

0

0

0

0

••

••••••

0

••

000000.

1
4
14
16
20
27

29
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
39

INDEX OF OUR FIRST TEN YEARS
In RP)1 there appeared a cumulative index of articles, reviews and other pieces publishes!_ in Radical
Philosophy from issue No.1 to issue No.30. Further copies are available, free of charge,for those
considering purchasing back numbers.

Please write to: M!ke Shortland, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of
Leeds, LS6 9JT

RADICAL PHILOSOPHY GROUP
The Radical Philosophy Group grew out of a convergence of two currents which had been largely
formed by the student movement of the 1960s – on the one hand, discontent, especially among
students, with the sterile and complacent philosophy taught in British universities and colleges; on
the other hand, a revival of interest in the theoretical work of the left and a recognition’ of the
need to confront the ideology enshrined in orthodox academic discipilines. The Radical Philosophy
Group has always contended that these two problems can be tackled together – that philosophical
inquiry into fundamental issues must lead to the exposure of conservatism masquerading as formal
reason.

Academic philosophy in this country has generally accepted and defended the frame of reference of
the dominant bourgeois culture. This culture is supported and mirrored by the elitist isolation, the
internal hierarchies and demarcations, of academic institutions. The Radical Philosophy Group
therefore works for reforms in courses and assessments for the enlargement of students’ control
over their education, for the breaking down of barriers between philosophy and other disciplines
and between academic institutions and the outside world.

The Group has held numerous conferences, and local groups have been formed which have organised
meetings and agi ta ted on local issues. Radical Philosophy is the magazine of the Radical Philosophy
Group, and has come out three times a year since January 1972. It aims to criticise the current
state of philosophy in the English-speaking world and to encourage philosophical discussion on the
left. It welcomes any contributions which will serve these aims.

f -_ __

Download the PDFBuy the latest issue